Phylogeny of the most species-rich freshwater bivalve family (Bivalvia: Unionida: Unionidae): Defining modern subfamilies and tribes
Göster/ Aç
Tarih
2017Yazar
Lopes-Lima, ManuelFroufe, Elsa
Do, Van Tu
Ghamizi, Mohamed
Mock, Karen E.
Kebapçı, Ümit
Klishko, Olga
Kovitvadhi, Satit
Kovitvadhi, Uthaiwan
Paulo, Octavio S.
Pfeiffer, John M.
Raley, Morgan
Riccardi, Nicoletta
Şereflişan, Hülya
Sousa, Ronaldo
Teixeira, Amilcar
Varandas, Simone
Wu, Xiaoping
Zanatta, David T.
Zieritz, Alexandra
Bogan, Arthur E.
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını gösterKünye
Lopes-Lima, M., Froufe, E., Do, V. T., Ghamizi, M., Mock, K. E., Kebapçı, Ü., Klishko, O., Kovitvadhi, S., Kovitvadhi, U., Paulo, O. S., Pfeiffer, J. M., Raley, M., Riccardi, N., Şereflişan, H., Sousa, R., Teixeira, A., Varandas, S., Wu, X., Zanatta, D. T., Zieritz, A., Bogan, A. E. (2017). Phylogeny of the most species-rich freshwater bivalve family (Bivalvia: Unionida: Unionidae): Defining modern subfamilies and tribes. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 106, 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.08.021Özet
Freshwater mussels of the order Unionida are key elements of freshwater habitats and are responsible for important ecological functions and services. Unfortunately, these bivalves are among the most threatened freshwater taxa in the world. However, conservation planning and management are hindered by taxonomic problems and a lack of detailed ecological data. This highlights the urgent need for advances in the areas of systematics and evolutionary relationships within the Unionida. This study presents the most comprehensive phylogeny to date of the larger Unionida family, i.e., the Unionidae. The phylogeny is based on a combined dataset of 1032 bp (COI + 28S) of 70 species in 46 genera, with 7 of this genera being sequenced for the first time. The resulting phylogeny divided the Unionidae into 6 supported subfamilies and 18 tribes, three of which are here named for the first time (i.e., Chamberlainiini nomen novum, Cristariini nomen novum and Lanceolariini nomen novum). Molecular analyses were complemented by investigations of selected morphological, anatomical and behavioral characters used in traditional phylogenetic studies. No single morphological, anatomical or behavioral character was diagnostic at the subfamily level and few were useful at the tribe level. However, within subfamilies, many tribes can be recognized based on a subset of these characters. The geographical distribution of each of the subfamilies and tribes is also presented. The present study provides important advances in the systematics of these extraordinary taxa with implications for future ecological and conservation studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.